Ray Hyman
University of Oregon psychologist commissioned by an Air Force-funded ARPA program to evaluate Uri Geller at SRI in the 1970s; concluded Geller was fraudulent, costing Puthoff and Targ their government contract to study him. Two decades later, served on the CIA-commissioned 1995 panel that concluded remote viewing had never produced actionable intelligence.
In the consciousness threadClassified 25 August 2026 from this entity's own role text, which reads: "rved on the CIA-commissioned 1995 panel that concluded remote viewing had never produced actionable intelligence.". An editorial classification, the same kind of field as cat - it rests on no page and does not claim to.
None of this entity's 3 connections has a source you can open.
3 connections
-
publicly criticised his and Targ's testing of Uri Geller as methodologically unsoundRay Hyman, critiques of the SRI/Geller experiments (1977; The Elusive Quarry, 1989)Caveat REWORDED 30 August 2026. "Found it fraudulent" is an accusation of FRAUD against a living scientist, recorded in this map's own voice with no source a reader can open. Fraud alleges intent to deceive; what Hyman is known to have argued is that the protocols were inadequate. The sentence now says what kind of criticism it was and leaves the accusation of dishonesty out, because this project holds nothing that would support it.
-
served on the 1995 CIA-commissioned review panel evaluating his programU.S. government remote-viewing program (Grill Flame/Stargate) history
-
his 2011 precognition paper drew prominent skeptical rebuttalFeeling the Future (2011); skeptical responses
1 correction to this record
Generated from the record, not written by hand. Every change keeps what the map used to say, because a correction nobody can see is indistinguishable from never having been wrong.