Civilian Contractors & Companies

Ingo Swann

1972–2013

The primary psychic subject and co-developer of "Coordinate Remote Viewing" methodology for the CIA/SRI remote-viewing program run by Hal Puthoff and Russell Targ.

Explore Ingo Swann in the live connections board → Open the case file

Connections (9)

confirmedPat Price

met him and Puthoff near SRI, leading to his recruitment

Source: Jim Schnabel, Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies (1997) · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedMaimonides Dream Laboratory

tested there before his SRI recruitment

Source: Ingo Swann biography; Maimonides records

confirmedHal Puthoff

co-developed remote viewing methodology at SRI

Source: Targ & Puthoff, Mind-Reach (1977); Puthoff, CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at SRI, J. Scientific Exploration (1996) · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedRussell Targ

SRI remote-viewing collaborators

Source: Targ & Puthoff, Mind-Reach (1977); Puthoff, CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at SRI, J. Scientific Exploration (1996) · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedL. Ron Hubbard

both were high-level Scientologists

Source: Jim Schnabel, Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies (1997)

confirmedEdwin May

worked together at Maimonides; recommended him to SRI

Source: Jim Schnabel, Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies (1997) · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedProject SCANATE

his coordinate remote-viewing demonstrations launched it

Source: Puthoff, CIA-Initiated Remote Viewing at Stanford Research Institute; SCANATE history · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedStanford Research Institute

primary psychic test subject there

Source: Jim Schnabel, Remote Viewers: The Secret History of America's Psychic Spies (1997) · Targ 2019 (JSE)

confirmedStargate Project

developed its coordinate remote-viewing methodology

Source: US remote-viewing program history · Targ 2019 (JSE)

Part of The Red Thread Files — an independent, evidence-first investigation into the UAP, USO, and consciousness question. Confidence labels (confirmed / reported / disputed) are an automated approximation based on the wording and directness of each source, not a verdict. Corrections: [email protected].