The Red Thread Files ◀ All entries Open the case room
Scientists & Researchers

Andrija Puharich

1971–1995

Physician and parapsychologist who studied claimed psychic phenomena for the Pentagon, CIA, and Naval Intelligence at Edgewood Arsenal in the 1950s. In December 1952, an Indian mystic he'd invited to a channeling session, Dhundiraj G. Vinod, went into trance and claimed contact with a group of entities calling themselves "The Nine" — a thread Puharich pursued for decades and carried directly into his later work with Uri Geller. After meeting Geller in Israel in 1971 and bringing him to the U.S., Puharich became his most prominent public advocate, writing a credulous 1974 biography claiming Geller was in hypnotic contact with an extraterrestrial intelligence called "Spectra" — echoing the earlier Nine sessions. Journalist Annie Jacobsen has alleged the CIA used Edgar Mitchell's Mind Science Institute as a conduit for payments to Puharich and Geller during Geller's 1972 SRI evaluation.

Explore Andrija Puharich in the live connections board → Open the case file

Connections (5)

confirmedHal Puthoff
arranged Geller's SRI evaluation, which Puthoff co-led
Source: Annie Jacobsen, Phenomena (2017)
confirmedRussell Targ
arranged Geller's SRI evaluation, which Targ co-led
Source: Annie Jacobsen, Phenomena (2017)
confirmedUri Geller
brought him to the U.S. in 1971 and became his most prominent public advocate
Source: Annie Jacobsen, Phenomena (2017)
reportedItzhak Bentov
described in UAP-podcast lore as very close to Puharich (an Israeli counterpart); not corroborated by neutral biographies
Source: UAP roundtable podcast; not corroborated by neutral sources
reportedEdgar Mitchell
journalist Annie Jacobsen alleges his institute was a CIA conduit for payments to Puharich during Geller's SRI evaluation
Part of The Red Thread Files — an independent, evidence-first investigation into the UAP, USO, and consciousness question. Confidence labels (confirmed / reported / disputed) are an automated approximation based on the wording and directness of each source, not a verdict. Corrections: [email protected].