Document · hearing
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena
What this is
4 passages have been read off pages of this document and are printed below. What is missing is the summary: nobody has yet written the sentence saying what that reading establishes, and this block prints that sentence and nothing else. Read the passages themselves.
4 passages read · 53 pages held
Open the document at congress.gov →4 passages read
“Could you describe any other initiatives that the DOD or DOD contractors have managed after Project Blue Book ended and prior to AATIP beginning? Did anything also predate Project Blue Book? Mr. Moultrie. So I can't speak to what may have predated Project Blue Book. I mean, of course, there is Roswell and all these other things that people have talked about over the years. I am familiar with Blue Book. I am familiar with AATIP. I haven't seen other documented studies that have been done by DOD in that regard. Mr. Gallagher. So you are not aware of anything between Project Blue Book and AATIP. Mr. Moultrie. Not aware of anything that is official that was done in between those two. Mr. Gallagher. Okay. Mr. Moultrie. Hasn”
printed p. 35 · PDF p. 35 · HHRG-117-IG05-Transcript-20220517 · born-digital text layer extracted from the held PDF and read, 2026-09-02. The page has NOT been rendered and nobody has looked at it as a picture. This grade is below the one this project quotes from; render and check before any of this is promoted to a quotation on a public page.
“finally, are you aware of a document that appeared around 2019 sometimes called the Admiral Wilson memo or EW Notes Memo? Mr. Moultrie. I am not. Are you? Mr. Bray. I am not personally aware of that”
printed p. 38 · PDF p. 38 · HHRG-117-IG05-Transcript-20220517 · born-digital text layer extracted from the held PDF and read, 2026-09-02. The page has NOT been rendered and nobody has looked at it as a picture. This grade is below the one this project quotes from; render and check before any of this is promoted to a quotation on a public page.
“We have not had a collision. We have had at least 11 near misses, though”
printed p. 40 · PDF p. 40 · HHRG-117-IG05-Transcript-20220517 · born-digital text layer extracted from the held PDF and read, 2026-09-02. The page has NOT been rendered and nobody has looked at it as a picture. This grade is below the one this project quotes from; render and check before any of this is promoted to a quotation on a public page.
“the example that I would say that it is still unresolved that I think everyone understands quite well is the 2004 incident from Nimitz. We have data on that, and that simply remains unresolved”
printed p. 48 · PDF p. 48 · HHRG-117-IG05-Transcript-20220517 · born-digital text layer extracted from the held PDF and read, 2026-09-02. The page has NOT been rendered and nobody has looked at it as a picture. This grade is below the one this project quotes from; render and check before any of this is promoted to a quotation on a public page.
Where no sheet is shown, the quote was still read off the page, rendered from the file we hold. A page image has not been prepared for the web for that page yet.
What this document is used for, page by page
Every claim on this map that rests on this document, and every claim tested against it and deliberately not used — in the order you would meet them reading the file itself. Where the check was written down, our wording is followed by the document’s own sentence, so you can hold the two side by side. 11 of 17 name a page.
Printed page 11 claim
Adam Schiff→Ronald Moultrie
attended the May 2022 hearing as chairman of the full committee, where Moultrie testified
our wording was corrected
Printed page 271 claim
Printed page 353 claims
Ronald Moultrie→Project Blue Book
testified in open session that he is aware of nothing official between it and AATIP
Ronald Moultrie→AATIP
testified in open session that he is aware of nothing official between Project Blue Book and it
Mike Gallagher→Ronald Moultrie
put the question of what ran between Project Blue Book and AATIP to him on the record
Printed page 361 claim
Mike Gallagher→Malmstrom AFB
put the reported Malmstrom incident to the Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence in open session
Printed page 371 claim
the record disagrees with itself
Printed page 382 claims
Printed page 482 claims
Scott Bray→Nimitz Encounter (2004)
as Deputy Director of Naval Intelligence named it in open session as the case that "simply remains unresolved"
Nimitz Encounter (2004)→House Intelligence UAP Hearing (2022)
cited at this hearing by the Navy witness as its example of a case that remains unresolved
No page named6 claims — the document is named, the page is not
our wording was corrected
What this page does not carry. NO OATH IS ADMINISTERED AT THIS HEARING, unlike the House Oversight hearings of 2023 and 2024, which swear their witnesses under Committee Rule 9(g).
our wording was corrected
What this page does not carry. as stated above, and it governs this page too