Adam Frank
Professor of astrophysics at the University of Rochester; published a Big Think critique calling Grusch's claims "just hearsay," comparing the chain of sourcing to "a guy says he knows a guy who knows another guy who heard from a guy," and said the account is "an extraordinary claim, and it requires extraordinary evidence, none of which we're getting."
In the UAP recordRuled into the unidentified-phenomena thread on 3 September 2026 by reading this entity's record, after the automated screen proposed "neither" for it. The screen's "neither" only means that no term from its vocabulary fired; the deciding phrase here is this entity's own: "calling Grusch's claims". An editorial classification of which thread this entity belongs to; it rests on no page and does not claim to.
None of this entity's 1 connection has a source you can open.
1 connection
-
called the claims hearsay lacking extraordinary evidencePublic commentary and testimony on the Grusch disclosures (2023)