Eugene Bertrand
Exeter, New Hampshire patrolman who returned to the field with Muscarello and saw the object at close range. Four years in the Air Force on refuelling operations, which he cited in writing to Project Blue Book as the reason he could not have mistaken it for a military exercise.
In the UAP recordRuled into the unidentified-phenomena thread on 2 September 2026 from this entity's own name and role text, which contain: "blue book". An editorial classification of what thread this entity belongs to; it rests on no page and does not claim to. Neighbours were not used - see apply-subjects-2026-09-02.mjs for why.
3 of 3 connections resolve to a document you can open.
Documents1 behind a connection
Documents behind a connection
- Unidentified Flying Objects 1966-04-05
Also named in documents we hold
This entity's name appears in the 1 document below. That is the entire claim. Nothing here is evidence for anything on this map, no connection rests on it, and it says nothing about what the document is about. It is a place to look next.
3 connections
-
responding patrolman who saw the object at close rangeUnidentified Flying Objectsprinted p. 6016 checked against the page
-
co-signed the December 1965 letter disputing the Air Force explanationsame document as the row aboveprinted p. 6040 checked against the page
-
co-signed the 2 December 1965 letter to him rejecting the Big Blast and weather-inversion explanationssame document as the row aboveprinted p. 6040 · PDF p. 52 checked against the pageCaveat The word "rejecting" is this project's summary and not the officers' own language. They do not write that they reject the Air Force explanations; they set out why the timing rules Big Blast out, state that the weather was clear, and ask for help against the suggestion that they made the story up or were incompetent observers. Read the folio for their wording.