Government / Military
Hector Quintanilla Jr.
1963-01-01year known, day not recorded
Major, U.S. Air Force; Chief of Project Blue Book at Wright-Patterson AFB in the mid-1960s. Briefed the USAF Scientific Advisory Board ad hoc committee on Blue Book in February 1966, corresponded directly with the Exeter witnesses, and testified in person at the 5 April 1966 House Armed Services hearing. NOT to be confused with any other Quintanilla.
In the UAP recordRuled into the unidentified-phenomena thread on 2 September 2026 from this entity's own name and role text, which contain: "blue book". An editorial classification of what thread this entity belongs to; it rests on no page and does not claim to. Neighbours were not used - see apply-subjects-2026-09-02.mjs for why.
6 of 6 connections resolve to a document you can open.
Documents1 behind a connection
Documents behind a connection
- Unidentified Flying Objects 1966-04-05
6 connections
ColourJournalistsIncidentsGovernmentHearings & panels
-
Chief of Project Blue BookUnidentified Flying Objectsprinted p. 6041 checked against the page
-
signed the Air Force letter saying the investigation indicated a possible association with Operation Big Blast, and that no final evaluation could yet be madesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 6041 checked against the page
-
co-signed the 2 December 1965 letter to him rejecting the Big Blast and weather-inversion explanationssame document as the row aboveprinted p. 6040 · PDF p. 52 checked against the pageCaveat The word "rejecting" is this project's summary and not the officers' own language. They do not write that they reject the Air Force explanations; they set out why the timing rules Big Blast out, state that the weather was clear, and ask for help against the suggestion that they made the story up or were incompetent observers. Read the folio for their wording.
-
briefed it on Project Blue Book, 3 February 1966same document as the row aboveprinted p. 5996 · PDF p. 8 checked against the page
-
denied to Congress the radar contact and scrambled fighters in Fuller's accountsame document as the row above
-
co-signed the 2 December 1965 letter to him rejecting the Big Blast and weather-inversion explanationssame document as the row aboveprinted p. 6040 · PDF p. 52 checked against the pageCaveat The word "rejecting" is this project's summary and not the officers' own language. They do not write that they reject the Air Force explanations; they set out why the timing rules Big Blast out, state that the weather was clear, and ask for help against the suggestion that they made the story up or were incompetent observers.