Whether remote viewing was human experimentation
The question the US government asked itself repeatedly for thirteen years and answered differently each time: whether taking soldiers and civilians through psychoenergetic training and operations constituted experimentation on human subjects under 45 CFR Part 46 and Procedure 18 of DoD Directive 5240.1-R. The Army General Counsel said yes in February 1979; the Surgeon General's board said no in March 1979 and yes in November 1979; DoD General Counsel approved a finding in November 1981 that it was human experimentation whose benefits justified the risks; and the CIA in December 1992 decided to treat Operation Stargate 'as if' it did.
In the consciousness threadClassified 25 August 2026 from this entity's own role text, which reads: "ch time: whether taking soldiers and civilians through psychoenergetic training and operations constituted experimentation on human s". An editorial classification, the same kind of field as cat - it rests on no page and does not claim to.
4 of 4 connections resolve to a document you can open.
Documents3 behind these connections
Documents behind these connections
4 connections
-
the Army ruled on it three times in nine months and reversed itself twiceCENTER LANE Information Papers for Director, Defense Intelligence AgencyPDF p. 31 checked against the page
-
the settled Army position by 1981 was that it WAS human experimentation and that the benefits justified the risksFact Sheet: GRILL FLAME/CENTER LANEPDF p. 1 checked against the page
-
the CIA decided in 1992 to treat the program as if it constituted human experimentationMemorandum re Operation Stargate: compliance with the laws concerning human experimentationPDF p. 2 checked against the page
-
was briefed on the question in July 1981, the only member of Congress the record shows being briefed on itCENTER LANE Information Papers for Director, Defense Intelligence AgencyPDF p. 32 checked against the page
Notes on this record
Filed as an incident for colour, matching the only other concept nodes on this map. It is not an incident; `form` says what it is.