The Red Thread Files
UFO / UAP · Consciousness
1945–2026621 entities437 of 1390 connections sourced138 documents held
The Red Thread Files
Scientist or researcher

Jessica Utts

1995-01-01year known, day not recorded

Professor of statistics (UC Irvine) and 2016 president of the American Statistical Association. Co-authored the 1995 statistical evaluation of the U.S. government's Stargate remote-viewing program, concluding the measured effect was statistically significant. Served as a judge on the 2021 BICS essay contest.

In the consciousness threadClassified 25 August 2026 from this entity's own role text, which reads: "atistical evaluation of the U.S. government's Stargate remote-viewing program, concluding the measured effect was statistically sig". An editorial classification, the same kind of field as cat - it rests on no page and does not claim to.

2 of 3 connections resolve to a document you can open.

Documents1 behind a connection

3 connections

ColourGovernmentOrganizations

2 corrections to this record

Generated from the record, not written by hand. Every change keeps what the map used to say, because a correction nobody can see is indistinguishable from never having been wrong.

Jessica Utts → Stanford Research Institute
co-authored the 1995 evaluation of the government remote-viewing program that began at SRI
prepared one of the two separate expert reviews of the remote-viewing program SRI began
She did not co-author the evaluation. The report says: "Separate written reviews were prepared by Dr. Utts and Dr. Hyman. They exchanged reviews with other panel members who then tried to reach a consensus." She wrote one of two independent reviews. The same correction was made to link 1049 by the operator on 2026-08-19; this is its twin, missed at the time.
Jessica Utts → Stargate Project
co-authored its 1995 statistical evaluation
prepared one of the two separate expert reviews in its 1995 evaluation
"Co-authored" implied Utts helped write the official verdict. She prepared one of two independent reviews and the other reached the opposite conclusion. The old wording moved a contested finding into the official column.