Luis Elizondo
Former DoD counterintelligence officer who says he ran/led AATIP (a role the Pentagon disputes); resigned in Oct 2017 and went public.
In the UAP recordRuled into the unidentified-phenomena thread on 2 September 2026 from this entity's own name and role text, which contain: "aatip". An editorial classification of what thread this entity belongs to; it rests on no page and does not claim to. Neighbours were not used - see apply-subjects-2026-09-02.mjs for why.
15 of 31 connections resolve to a document you can open. 8 carry no citation at all.
Documents3 behind these connections
Documents behind these connections
Also named in documents we hold
This entity's name appears in the 1 document below. That is the entire claim. Nothing here is evidence for anything on this map, no connection rests on it, and it says nothing about what the document is about. It is a place to look next.
31 connections
-
← AATIPhe described himself as part of it, having joined after it evolved from AAWSAPUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truthprinted p. 21 checked against the page
-
joined after resigningUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Implications on National Security, Public Safety, and Government Transparencyprinted p. 14 checked against the pageCaveat Claim: Elizondo joined TTSA after resigning. The caution is about PROVENANCE - Fravor relating events he was told about - not about whether it happened. A weaker witness for the same fact.scope: scoped · reviewed 2026-08-21
-
both testified before House Oversight, at separate hearings - Elizondo 13 November 2024, Borland 9 September 2025
-
testified before her committeeUnidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truthprinted p. 31 · PDF p. 35 checked against the pageCaveat The page establishes the questioning and not the ownership of the committee. The hearing prints Nancy Mace as Chairwoman.scope: scoped · reviewed 2026-08-25
-
testified before his committeesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 25 · PDF p. 29 checked against the page
-
co-testified at the November 2024 House hearingsame document as the row above
-
chaired the hearing where he testifiedsame document as the row above
-
testified under oathsame document as the row aboveprinted p. 9 · PDF p. 13 checked against the page
-
→ AAWSAPjoined it around 2009 and testified under oath that it was his predecessor programmesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 21 · PDF p. 25
-
testified under oath that its sites appear to be under surveillance and monitoring, and named three of themsame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51Caveat READ THIS BESIDE MICHAEL GOLD ON THE SAME PANEL, printed page 31 of the same hearing: "because we have got more cameras, more monitoring of national security, we do not know how extensive UAP activity may be over civilian areas." That is sensor bias, and it is the strongest honest objection to reading this clustering as a fact about where UAP are rather than a fact about where the sensors are. It was raised in the same room, on the same day, by a sworn witness, and it travels with this claim.
-
named it under oath as one of three Department of Energy sites he says appear to be under surveillancesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51
-
named it under oath as one of three Department of Energy sites he says appear to be under surveillancesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51
-
named it, with Oak Ridge and Los Alamos, as a sensitive site under apparent surveillancesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51 checked against the page
-
named it as a sensitive site under apparent surveillancesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51 checked against the page
-
named it as a sensitive site under apparent surveillancesame document as the row aboveprinted p. 47 · PDF p. 51 checked against the page
-
claimed craft recoveredRoswell case histories; Berlitz & Moore, The Roswell Incident (1980)
-
left TTSA togetherTo The Stars Academy public founding disclosures (2017)
-
named it as a legacy-program contractor; company denied itElizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
→ Raytheonnamed it as a legacy-program contractor; company denied itElizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
named it as a legacy-program contractorElizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
→ Boeingnamed it as a legacy-program contractorElizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
one of the contractors asked to comment; no responseElizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
clashed over 'legacy program' claims (2026)Elizondo legacy-program statements; company responses (2023-24)
-
released his video
-
disputed his role
-
official rebuttal
-
Elizondo has said the memo is legitimate
-
joined discussion of his claims
-
disputed each other's credibility
-
his caudate-putamen research is cited as a possible biological explanation
-
established following his 2017 public disclosure of AATIP/AAWSAP
1 correction to this record
Generated from the record, not written by hand. Every change keeps what the map used to say, because a correction nobody can see is indistinguishable from never having been wrong.