The Red Thread Files ◀ All entries Open the case room
Historical Incidents & Events

Robertson Panel

1953

CIA-convened scientific panel (chaired by Caltech physicist H.P. Robertson; members Luis Alvarez, Thornton Page, Samuel Goudsmit, Lloyd Berkner) that reviewed UFO evidence over four days in January 1953 and concluded there was no evidence of extraterrestrial craft. Its recommendations - a mass-media education program to reduce public gullibility and sighting reports, and the watching of civilian UFO groups (it named APRO and the Los Angeles Civilian Flying Saucer Investigators) because of their potentially great influence on mass thinking - are the documented origin of official UFO debunking policy. Recorded by F.C. Durant (the Durant Report); convened at the urging of CIA science chief Marshall Chadwell.

Explore Robertson Panel in the live connections board → Open the case file

Connections (16)

confirmedThornton Page
panel member
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedSamuel Goudsmit
panel member
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedHerbert Scoville Jr.
cited its prior conclusion that UFO sightings posed no security threat
Source: CIA Robertson Panel report (1953)
confirmedLloyd Berkner
panel member (absent for part of the sessions)
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedF.C. Durant
secretary/rapporteur; authored the panel report (the Durant Report)
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedRichard Doty
continues the official UFO-debunking/disinformation posture the 1953 Robertson Panel first recommended (analyst note)
Source: analyst note; Greenwood & Bishop, Project Beta; R. Doty AFOSI disclosures (HuffPost 2014; The Debrief)
confirmedH.P. Robertson
chaired the panel
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedLuis Alvarez
panel member; analyzed the Tremonton, Utah film
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedMarshall Chadwell
the CIA science chief who convened the panel
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedJ. Allen Hynek
took part as ATIC's astronomical consultant (associate member)
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedProject Blue Book
reviewed its case files and found no evidence of craft
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedAllen Dulles
commissioned it weeks into his CIA tenure
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
confirmedCentral Intelligence Agency
convened by the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence (1953)
Source: Wikipedia: Robertson Panel
reportedHarry Turner
his 1971 memo alleged Blue Book was a front masking deeper programs
Source: USAF Project Blue Book records; Ruppelt, Report on Unidentified Flying Objects (1956)
reportedPentacle Memorandum (1953)
believed to reference the Washington meeting held days before the CIA Robertson Panel convened Jan 14, 1953
Source: Vallee, Forbidden Science; Gralien Report
disputedMaj. Dewey Fournet
presented his "motion study" concluding extraterrestrial origin, which the panel rejected
Source: F.C. Durant, Report of Meetings of the OSI Scientific Advisory Panel on UFOs (Durant Report), CIA, Jan 14-18 1953
Part of The Red Thread Files — an independent, evidence-first investigation into the UAP, USO, and consciousness question. Confidence labels (confirmed / reported / disputed) are an automated approximation based on the wording and directness of each source, not a verdict. Corrections: [email protected].